Cerebrospinal fluid osmolality cannot predict development or surgical outcome of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Cerebrospinal fluid osmolality cannot predict development or surgical outcome of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. / Ørnbo, Eva Kjer; Steffensen, Annette Buur; Gredal, Hanne; Poulsen, Helle Harding; Rostgaard, Nina; Rasmussen, Cecilie Holm; Møller-Nissen, Marlene; Simonsen, Anja Hviid; Hasselbalch, Steen Gregers; Juhler, Marianne; MacAulay, Nanna.
In: Fluids and Barriers of the CNS, Vol. 19, No. 1, 52, 2022.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Cerebrospinal fluid osmolality cannot predict development or surgical outcome of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus
AU - Ørnbo, Eva Kjer
AU - Steffensen, Annette Buur
AU - Gredal, Hanne
AU - Poulsen, Helle Harding
AU - Rostgaard, Nina
AU - Rasmussen, Cecilie Holm
AU - Møller-Nissen, Marlene
AU - Simonsen, Anja Hviid
AU - Hasselbalch, Steen Gregers
AU - Juhler, Marianne
AU - MacAulay, Nanna
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background: The etiology of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is currently unknown. With no visible obstructions, altered cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics may explain the accumulation of ventricular fluid. We hypothesized that elevated osmolality in the CSF of iNPH patients could potentiate formation of ventricular fluid and thereby cause the disease progression and/or predict the surgical outcome. To address this hypothesis, we determined the lumbar and ventricular CSF osmolality of iNPH patients at different disease stages and compared with lumbar CSF samples obtained from control subjects.Methods: The osmolality of CSF was determined on a total of 35 iNPH patients at diagnosis and at the subsequent treatment with shunt surgery (n = 20) and compared with the CSF osmolality from 20 control subjects. Simultaneously collected lumbar and ventricular CSF samples from experimental pigs were used to evaluate the compatibility between CSF from different compartments.Results: We found no evidence of increased osmolality in the CSF of iNPH patients upon diagnosis or at the time of shunt treatment months after the diagnosis, compared with control individuals. CSF tapped from the lumbar space could be used as a read-out for ventricular CSF osmolality, as these were similar in both the patient group and in experimental pigs. We further observed no correlation between the CSF osmolality in iNPH patients and their responsiveness to shunt surgeries.Conclusions: The osmolality of lumbar CSF is a reliable reflection of the ventricular CSF osmolality, and is not elevated in iNPH patients. iNPH therefore does not appear to arise as a function of osmotic imbalances in the CSF system and CSF osmolality cannot serve as a biomarker for iNPH or as a predictive tool for shunt responsiveness.
AB - Background: The etiology of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is currently unknown. With no visible obstructions, altered cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics may explain the accumulation of ventricular fluid. We hypothesized that elevated osmolality in the CSF of iNPH patients could potentiate formation of ventricular fluid and thereby cause the disease progression and/or predict the surgical outcome. To address this hypothesis, we determined the lumbar and ventricular CSF osmolality of iNPH patients at different disease stages and compared with lumbar CSF samples obtained from control subjects.Methods: The osmolality of CSF was determined on a total of 35 iNPH patients at diagnosis and at the subsequent treatment with shunt surgery (n = 20) and compared with the CSF osmolality from 20 control subjects. Simultaneously collected lumbar and ventricular CSF samples from experimental pigs were used to evaluate the compatibility between CSF from different compartments.Results: We found no evidence of increased osmolality in the CSF of iNPH patients upon diagnosis or at the time of shunt treatment months after the diagnosis, compared with control individuals. CSF tapped from the lumbar space could be used as a read-out for ventricular CSF osmolality, as these were similar in both the patient group and in experimental pigs. We further observed no correlation between the CSF osmolality in iNPH patients and their responsiveness to shunt surgeries.Conclusions: The osmolality of lumbar CSF is a reliable reflection of the ventricular CSF osmolality, and is not elevated in iNPH patients. iNPH therefore does not appear to arise as a function of osmotic imbalances in the CSF system and CSF osmolality cannot serve as a biomarker for iNPH or as a predictive tool for shunt responsiveness.
KW - CSF
KW - Osmolarity
KW - Biomarker
KW - iNPH
KW - ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE
KW - BULK FLOW
KW - MANAGEMENT
KW - BIOMARKERS
KW - DIAGNOSIS
KW - PROTEINS
KW - DYNAMICS
U2 - 10.1186/s12987-022-00349-5
DO - 10.1186/s12987-022-00349-5
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 35761330
VL - 19
JO - Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
JF - Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
SN - 2045-8118
IS - 1
M1 - 52
ER -
ID: 312691745