Spastic movement disorder: should we forget hyperexcitable stretch reflexes and start talking about inappropriate prediction of sensory consequences of movement?

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Standard

Spastic movement disorder : should we forget hyperexcitable stretch reflexes and start talking about inappropriate prediction of sensory consequences of movement? / Nielsen, Jens Bo; Christensen, Mark Schram; Farmer, Simon Francis; Lorentzen, Jakob.

In: Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 238, 2020, p. 1627-1636.

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Nielsen, JB, Christensen, MS, Farmer, SF & Lorentzen, J 2020, 'Spastic movement disorder: should we forget hyperexcitable stretch reflexes and start talking about inappropriate prediction of sensory consequences of movement?', Experimental Brain Research, vol. 238, pp. 1627-1636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-05792-0

APA

Nielsen, J. B., Christensen, M. S., Farmer, S. F., & Lorentzen, J. (2020). Spastic movement disorder: should we forget hyperexcitable stretch reflexes and start talking about inappropriate prediction of sensory consequences of movement? Experimental Brain Research, 238, 1627-1636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-05792-0

Vancouver

Nielsen JB, Christensen MS, Farmer SF, Lorentzen J. Spastic movement disorder: should we forget hyperexcitable stretch reflexes and start talking about inappropriate prediction of sensory consequences of movement? Experimental Brain Research. 2020;238:1627-1636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-05792-0

Author

Nielsen, Jens Bo ; Christensen, Mark Schram ; Farmer, Simon Francis ; Lorentzen, Jakob. / Spastic movement disorder : should we forget hyperexcitable stretch reflexes and start talking about inappropriate prediction of sensory consequences of movement?. In: Experimental Brain Research. 2020 ; Vol. 238. pp. 1627-1636.

Bibtex

@article{129bb64d3c8e4b00b7135d0a5f0b6137,
title = "Spastic movement disorder: should we forget hyperexcitable stretch reflexes and start talking about inappropriate prediction of sensory consequences of movement?",
abstract = "Spastic movement disorder is characterized by reduced ability to selectively activate muscles with significant co-activation of antagonist muscles. It has traditionally been thought that hyperexcitable stretch reflexes have a central role in the pathophysiology and the clinical manifestations of the disorder. Here we argue that the main functional challenges for persons with spastic movement disorder are related to contractures, paresis, weak muscles and inappropriate central motor commands, whereas hyperexcitable reflexes play no or only an insignificant functional role. Co-activation of antagonist muscles and stiff posture and gait may rather be adaptations that aim to ensure joint and postural stability due to insufficient muscle strength. Aberrant (involuntary) muscle activity is likely related to an inadequate prediction of the sensory consequences of movement and a resulting impairment of muscle coordination. We argue that improvement of functional muscle strength and muscle coordination following central motor lesions may be achieved by optimizing integration of somatosensory information into central feedforward motor programs, whereas anti-spastic therapy that aims to reduce reflex activity may be less efficient. This opens for novel investigations into new treatment strategies that may improve functional control of movement and prevent reduced joint mobility in people with brain lesions.",
author = "Nielsen, {Jens Bo} and Christensen, {Mark Schram} and Farmer, {Simon Francis} and Jakob Lorentzen",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1007/s00221-020-05792-0",
language = "English",
volume = "238",
pages = "1627--1636",
journal = "Experimental Brain Research",
issn = "0014-4819",
publisher = "Springer",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spastic movement disorder

T2 - should we forget hyperexcitable stretch reflexes and start talking about inappropriate prediction of sensory consequences of movement?

AU - Nielsen, Jens Bo

AU - Christensen, Mark Schram

AU - Farmer, Simon Francis

AU - Lorentzen, Jakob

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Spastic movement disorder is characterized by reduced ability to selectively activate muscles with significant co-activation of antagonist muscles. It has traditionally been thought that hyperexcitable stretch reflexes have a central role in the pathophysiology and the clinical manifestations of the disorder. Here we argue that the main functional challenges for persons with spastic movement disorder are related to contractures, paresis, weak muscles and inappropriate central motor commands, whereas hyperexcitable reflexes play no or only an insignificant functional role. Co-activation of antagonist muscles and stiff posture and gait may rather be adaptations that aim to ensure joint and postural stability due to insufficient muscle strength. Aberrant (involuntary) muscle activity is likely related to an inadequate prediction of the sensory consequences of movement and a resulting impairment of muscle coordination. We argue that improvement of functional muscle strength and muscle coordination following central motor lesions may be achieved by optimizing integration of somatosensory information into central feedforward motor programs, whereas anti-spastic therapy that aims to reduce reflex activity may be less efficient. This opens for novel investigations into new treatment strategies that may improve functional control of movement and prevent reduced joint mobility in people with brain lesions.

AB - Spastic movement disorder is characterized by reduced ability to selectively activate muscles with significant co-activation of antagonist muscles. It has traditionally been thought that hyperexcitable stretch reflexes have a central role in the pathophysiology and the clinical manifestations of the disorder. Here we argue that the main functional challenges for persons with spastic movement disorder are related to contractures, paresis, weak muscles and inappropriate central motor commands, whereas hyperexcitable reflexes play no or only an insignificant functional role. Co-activation of antagonist muscles and stiff posture and gait may rather be adaptations that aim to ensure joint and postural stability due to insufficient muscle strength. Aberrant (involuntary) muscle activity is likely related to an inadequate prediction of the sensory consequences of movement and a resulting impairment of muscle coordination. We argue that improvement of functional muscle strength and muscle coordination following central motor lesions may be achieved by optimizing integration of somatosensory information into central feedforward motor programs, whereas anti-spastic therapy that aims to reduce reflex activity may be less efficient. This opens for novel investigations into new treatment strategies that may improve functional control of movement and prevent reduced joint mobility in people with brain lesions.

U2 - 10.1007/s00221-020-05792-0

DO - 10.1007/s00221-020-05792-0

M3 - Review

C2 - 32382862

VL - 238

SP - 1627

EP - 1636

JO - Experimental Brain Research

JF - Experimental Brain Research

SN - 0014-4819

ER -

ID: 240978100