Cutaneous mechanisms of isometric ankle force control

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Cutaneous mechanisms of isometric ankle force control. / Choi, Julia T; Jensen, Jesper Lundbye; Leukel, Christian; Nielsen, Jens Bo.

In: Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 228, No. 3, 2013, p. 377-384.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Choi, JT, Jensen, JL, Leukel, C & Nielsen, JB 2013, 'Cutaneous mechanisms of isometric ankle force control', Experimental Brain Research, vol. 228, no. 3, pp. 377-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3570-9

APA

Choi, J. T., Jensen, J. L., Leukel, C., & Nielsen, J. B. (2013). Cutaneous mechanisms of isometric ankle force control. Experimental Brain Research, 228(3), 377-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3570-9

Vancouver

Choi JT, Jensen JL, Leukel C, Nielsen JB. Cutaneous mechanisms of isometric ankle force control. Experimental Brain Research. 2013;228(3):377-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3570-9

Author

Choi, Julia T ; Jensen, Jesper Lundbye ; Leukel, Christian ; Nielsen, Jens Bo. / Cutaneous mechanisms of isometric ankle force control. In: Experimental Brain Research. 2013 ; Vol. 228, No. 3. pp. 377-384.

Bibtex

@article{a6e331768715474bb66451209ea3c9db,
title = "Cutaneous mechanisms of isometric ankle force control",
abstract = "The sense of force is critical in the control of movement and posture. Multiple factors influence our perception of exerted force, including inputs from cutaneous afferents, muscle afferents and central commands. Here, we studied the influence of cutaneous feedback on the control of ankle force output. We used repetitive electrical stimulation of the superficial peroneal (foot dorsum) and medial plantar nerves (foot sole) to disrupt cutaneous afferent input in 8 healthy subjects. We measured the effects of repetitive nerve stimulation on (1) tactile thresholds, (2) performance in an ankle force-matching and (3) an ankle position-matching task. Additional force-matching experiments were done to compare the effects of transient versus continuous stimulation in 6 subjects and to determine the effects of foot anesthesia using lidocaine in another 6 subjects. The results showed that stimulation decreased cutaneous sensory function as evidenced by increased touch threshold. Absolute dorsiflexion force error increased without visual feedback during peroneal nerve stimulation. This was not a general effect of stimulation because force error did not increase during plantar nerve stimulation. The effects of transient stimulation on force error were greater when compared to continuous stimulation and lidocaine injection. Position-matching performance was unaffected by peroneal nerve or plantar nerve stimulation. Our results show that cutaneous feedback plays a role in the control of force output at the ankle joint. Understanding how the nervous system normally uses cutaneous feedback in motor control will help us identify which functional aspects are impaired in aging and neurological diseases.",
author = "Choi, {Julia T} and Jensen, {Jesper Lundbye} and Christian Leukel and Nielsen, {Jens Bo}",
note = "CURIS 2013 NEXS 127",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1007/s00221-013-3570-9",
language = "English",
volume = "228",
pages = "377--384",
journal = "Experimental Brain Research",
issn = "0014-4819",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cutaneous mechanisms of isometric ankle force control

AU - Choi, Julia T

AU - Jensen, Jesper Lundbye

AU - Leukel, Christian

AU - Nielsen, Jens Bo

N1 - CURIS 2013 NEXS 127

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The sense of force is critical in the control of movement and posture. Multiple factors influence our perception of exerted force, including inputs from cutaneous afferents, muscle afferents and central commands. Here, we studied the influence of cutaneous feedback on the control of ankle force output. We used repetitive electrical stimulation of the superficial peroneal (foot dorsum) and medial plantar nerves (foot sole) to disrupt cutaneous afferent input in 8 healthy subjects. We measured the effects of repetitive nerve stimulation on (1) tactile thresholds, (2) performance in an ankle force-matching and (3) an ankle position-matching task. Additional force-matching experiments were done to compare the effects of transient versus continuous stimulation in 6 subjects and to determine the effects of foot anesthesia using lidocaine in another 6 subjects. The results showed that stimulation decreased cutaneous sensory function as evidenced by increased touch threshold. Absolute dorsiflexion force error increased without visual feedback during peroneal nerve stimulation. This was not a general effect of stimulation because force error did not increase during plantar nerve stimulation. The effects of transient stimulation on force error were greater when compared to continuous stimulation and lidocaine injection. Position-matching performance was unaffected by peroneal nerve or plantar nerve stimulation. Our results show that cutaneous feedback plays a role in the control of force output at the ankle joint. Understanding how the nervous system normally uses cutaneous feedback in motor control will help us identify which functional aspects are impaired in aging and neurological diseases.

AB - The sense of force is critical in the control of movement and posture. Multiple factors influence our perception of exerted force, including inputs from cutaneous afferents, muscle afferents and central commands. Here, we studied the influence of cutaneous feedback on the control of ankle force output. We used repetitive electrical stimulation of the superficial peroneal (foot dorsum) and medial plantar nerves (foot sole) to disrupt cutaneous afferent input in 8 healthy subjects. We measured the effects of repetitive nerve stimulation on (1) tactile thresholds, (2) performance in an ankle force-matching and (3) an ankle position-matching task. Additional force-matching experiments were done to compare the effects of transient versus continuous stimulation in 6 subjects and to determine the effects of foot anesthesia using lidocaine in another 6 subjects. The results showed that stimulation decreased cutaneous sensory function as evidenced by increased touch threshold. Absolute dorsiflexion force error increased without visual feedback during peroneal nerve stimulation. This was not a general effect of stimulation because force error did not increase during plantar nerve stimulation. The effects of transient stimulation on force error were greater when compared to continuous stimulation and lidocaine injection. Position-matching performance was unaffected by peroneal nerve or plantar nerve stimulation. Our results show that cutaneous feedback plays a role in the control of force output at the ankle joint. Understanding how the nervous system normally uses cutaneous feedback in motor control will help us identify which functional aspects are impaired in aging and neurological diseases.

U2 - 10.1007/s00221-013-3570-9

DO - 10.1007/s00221-013-3570-9

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 23702971

VL - 228

SP - 377

EP - 384

JO - Experimental Brain Research

JF - Experimental Brain Research

SN - 0014-4819

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 46266202