Computing the Local Field Potential (LFP) from Integrate-and-Fire Network Models

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Computing the Local Field Potential (LFP) from Integrate-and-Fire Network Models. / Mazzoni, Alberto; Linden, Henrik; Cuntz, Hermann; Lansner, Anders; Panzeri, Stefano; Einevoll, Gaute T.

In: PLoS Computational Biology, Vol. 11, No. 12, e1004584, 12.2015, p. 1-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Mazzoni, A, Linden, H, Cuntz, H, Lansner, A, Panzeri, S & Einevoll, GT 2015, 'Computing the Local Field Potential (LFP) from Integrate-and-Fire Network Models', PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 11, no. 12, e1004584, pp. 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004584

APA

Mazzoni, A., Linden, H., Cuntz, H., Lansner, A., Panzeri, S., & Einevoll, G. T. (2015). Computing the Local Field Potential (LFP) from Integrate-and-Fire Network Models. PLoS Computational Biology, 11(12), 1-38. [e1004584]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004584

Vancouver

Mazzoni A, Linden H, Cuntz H, Lansner A, Panzeri S, Einevoll GT. Computing the Local Field Potential (LFP) from Integrate-and-Fire Network Models. PLoS Computational Biology. 2015 Dec;11(12):1-38. e1004584. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004584

Author

Mazzoni, Alberto ; Linden, Henrik ; Cuntz, Hermann ; Lansner, Anders ; Panzeri, Stefano ; Einevoll, Gaute T. / Computing the Local Field Potential (LFP) from Integrate-and-Fire Network Models. In: PLoS Computational Biology. 2015 ; Vol. 11, No. 12. pp. 1-38.

Bibtex

@article{48121da1aafc4be98c1c640ed000a7f1,
title = "Computing the Local Field Potential (LFP) from Integrate-and-Fire Network Models",
abstract = "Leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) network models are commonly used to study how the spiking dynamics of neural networks changes with stimuli, tasks or dynamic network states. However, neurophysiological studies in vivo often rather measure the mass activity of neuronal microcircuits with the local field potential (LFP). Given that LFPs are generated by spatially separated currents across the neuronal membrane, they cannot be computed directly from quantities defined in models of point-like LIF neurons. Here, we explore the best approximation for predicting the LFP based on standard output from point-neuron LIF networks. To search for this best “LFP proxy”, we compared LFP predictions from candidate proxies based on LIF network output (e.g, firing rates, membrane potentials, synaptic currents) with “ground-truth” LFP obtained when the LIF network synaptic input currents were injected into an analogous three-dimensional (3D) network model of multi-compartmental neurons with realistic morphology, spatial distributions of somata and synapses. We found that a specific fixed linear combination of the LIF synaptic currents provided an accurate LFP proxy, accounting for most of the variance of the LFP time course observed in the 3D network for all recording locations. This proxy performed well over a broad set of conditions, including substantial variations of the neuronal morphologies. Our results provide a simple formula for estimating the time course of the LFP from LIF network simulations in cases where a single pyramidal population dominates the LFP generation, and thereby facilitate quantitative comparison between computational models and experimental LFP recordings in vivo.",
author = "Alberto Mazzoni and Henrik Linden and Hermann Cuntz and Anders Lansner and Stefano Panzeri and Einevoll, {Gaute T.}",
year = "2015",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004584",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "1--38",
journal = "P L o S Computational Biology (Online)",
issn = "1553-734X",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Computing the Local Field Potential (LFP) from Integrate-and-Fire Network Models

AU - Mazzoni, Alberto

AU - Linden, Henrik

AU - Cuntz, Hermann

AU - Lansner, Anders

AU - Panzeri, Stefano

AU - Einevoll, Gaute T.

PY - 2015/12

Y1 - 2015/12

N2 - Leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) network models are commonly used to study how the spiking dynamics of neural networks changes with stimuli, tasks or dynamic network states. However, neurophysiological studies in vivo often rather measure the mass activity of neuronal microcircuits with the local field potential (LFP). Given that LFPs are generated by spatially separated currents across the neuronal membrane, they cannot be computed directly from quantities defined in models of point-like LIF neurons. Here, we explore the best approximation for predicting the LFP based on standard output from point-neuron LIF networks. To search for this best “LFP proxy”, we compared LFP predictions from candidate proxies based on LIF network output (e.g, firing rates, membrane potentials, synaptic currents) with “ground-truth” LFP obtained when the LIF network synaptic input currents were injected into an analogous three-dimensional (3D) network model of multi-compartmental neurons with realistic morphology, spatial distributions of somata and synapses. We found that a specific fixed linear combination of the LIF synaptic currents provided an accurate LFP proxy, accounting for most of the variance of the LFP time course observed in the 3D network for all recording locations. This proxy performed well over a broad set of conditions, including substantial variations of the neuronal morphologies. Our results provide a simple formula for estimating the time course of the LFP from LIF network simulations in cases where a single pyramidal population dominates the LFP generation, and thereby facilitate quantitative comparison between computational models and experimental LFP recordings in vivo.

AB - Leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) network models are commonly used to study how the spiking dynamics of neural networks changes with stimuli, tasks or dynamic network states. However, neurophysiological studies in vivo often rather measure the mass activity of neuronal microcircuits with the local field potential (LFP). Given that LFPs are generated by spatially separated currents across the neuronal membrane, they cannot be computed directly from quantities defined in models of point-like LIF neurons. Here, we explore the best approximation for predicting the LFP based on standard output from point-neuron LIF networks. To search for this best “LFP proxy”, we compared LFP predictions from candidate proxies based on LIF network output (e.g, firing rates, membrane potentials, synaptic currents) with “ground-truth” LFP obtained when the LIF network synaptic input currents were injected into an analogous three-dimensional (3D) network model of multi-compartmental neurons with realistic morphology, spatial distributions of somata and synapses. We found that a specific fixed linear combination of the LIF synaptic currents provided an accurate LFP proxy, accounting for most of the variance of the LFP time course observed in the 3D network for all recording locations. This proxy performed well over a broad set of conditions, including substantial variations of the neuronal morphologies. Our results provide a simple formula for estimating the time course of the LFP from LIF network simulations in cases where a single pyramidal population dominates the LFP generation, and thereby facilitate quantitative comparison between computational models and experimental LFP recordings in vivo.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004584

DO - 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004584

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26657024

VL - 11

SP - 1

EP - 38

JO - P L o S Computational Biology (Online)

JF - P L o S Computational Biology (Online)

SN - 1553-734X

IS - 12

M1 - e1004584

ER -

ID: 160928071